Re: [avr-libc-dev] Towards a 1.2.1 release

[Paul Schlie]

A little while back someone sugested a refinement to malloc I think,
Did it have merrit?


> From: Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden>
> Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:03:20 +0100
> To: avr-libc-dev <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Towards a 1.2.1 release
> 
> As E. Weddington wrote:
> 
>> In moving towards a 1.2.1 release, the bugs that look doable:
> 
>> - #4101 setjmp/longjmp
>> Has patch that needs testing
> 
> I intend to look at this one, including all the emails Dmitry has been
> sending.
> 
>> - #11494 strtol wrong value
>> Has patch that needs testing
> 
> Hmm.
> 
>> There's all the math stuff that was discussed recently with Colin
>> (bug #11511), but I would hesitate to move quickly on any math
>> stuff.
> 
> Me too.  The fplib code is a plate full of spaghetti...
> 
>> There's patch #3516 (printf: handling of arg strings from progmem).
>> Perhaps this could get in for a 1.2.1 release?
> 
> Hmm, yes, I think so.
> 
>> I'm assuming we would want to release sooner rather than later, so
>> that way you (Joerg) are freed up for later on this month.
> 
> Don't worry, I think I'll find the time necessary, somehow.  I won't
> rush it.  If you're tight on schedule for the next WinAVR release,
> just give me a couple of weeks of an early warning, and I'll see to
> get 1.2.1 out in time.
> 
> -- 
> cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL
> 
> http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
> Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-libc-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev