Re: [avr-libc-dev] Automated testing project

[Peeter Vois]

I've been reading code of both approaches and would like to say my first
blick opinion: Simulavr has much higher quality source code, it is
understandable and well commented. Simulavrxxx is hard to understand and
not well commented.

Peeter


Ühel ilusal kenal päeval Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:38:17 -0400
Paul Schlie <address@hidden> kirjutas:

> Yes, however, although Ted has clearly stated he had no immediate
> plans to continue maintaining simulavr, its still the only avr
> simulator which basically works on a broad range of platforms;
> therefore seems premature to discourage it's use and/or consideration.
> (Although would likely have a different opinion if I could figure out
> how to bring simularxx up on OSX with the latest version of
> gdb/insight, which I can do with simulavr.)
> 
> 
> > From: Eric Weddington <address@hidden>
> >> Paul Schlie wrote:
> >> designated? designated by whom?
> > 
> > I'm assuming you are referring to the quote below since you didn't
> > take the time to trim it down.
> > 
> > It was designated by the original author of SimulAVR, which is
> > Theodore(Ted) A. Roth.
> > 
> >> 
> >>> From: Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden>
> >>> Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden>
> >>> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:35:06 +0200
> >>> To: <address@hidden>
> >>> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Automated testing project
> > 
> >>> Forget simulavr, it's unmaintained.  simulavrxx is the designated
> >>> successor (it lives in the same savannah project)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-libc-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev