[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:54:17 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of David Brown
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:24 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?
>
> Weddington, Eric wrote:
>
> > I'm planning on release WinAVR with GCC 4.2.2. The most
> major issue that
> > I see right now is GCC bug #29524
> > <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29524>
> > I would like to see a patch for this (even if it is not perfect but
> > works) sometime next week.
> >
>
> If that's the only sort of code quality issue remaining for 4.2, then
> the picture is not nearly as bleak as Dmitry's post suggested.
>
I can't say if that is the *only* issue. The bug list is here:
<http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/bugs.html>
But it is a major regression compared to 4.1.x.
Eric
- [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/26
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Dmitry K., 2007/11/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/11/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Anatoly Sokolov, 2007/11/28
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/28
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Dmitry K., 2007/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Wouter van Gulik, 2007/11/29
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Wouter van Gulik, 2007/11/29
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Dmitry K., 2007/11/30
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/30