[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8? |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:18:17 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of dpc
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:40 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?
>
> apologies if this is the wrong list or something i missed in the
> archives.
>
> short story: i get an ICE w/ gcc 4.6 when building avr-libc-1.4.8.
There is no GCC 4.6 release. The latest is GCC 4.5.0, unless you are doing
development work on GCC HEAD (which will be the future 4.6). And avr-libc 1.4.8
is a very old version. At the least, you should be using 1.6.8 as that is known
stable.
- [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/17
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/17
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/17
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/06/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/22
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/23
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/18