[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes
From: |
Mike Perks |
Subject: |
[avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:17:20 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080201 Firefox/2.0.0.12 |
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #22699 (project avrdude):
Followup to Joerg's comment on #2:
>> 2. The following devices use device code 0x75 although that
>> is already allocated to the mega16 bootloader. I suggest
>> that device code 0x73 might be better: mega329, mega329p,
>> mega3290, mega3290p, mega649, mega6490.
>
> I agree that 0x75 is a poor choice, and should be avoided.
> But in which respect would 0x73 (ATmega32 BOOT) be better
> here?
This is a typo on my part - I couldn't read my own writing. It should have
said 0x78 (mega169).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?22699>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes, anonymous, 2008/03/22
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/03/23
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes, Klaus Leidinger, 2008/03/23
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes, Mike Perks, 2008/03/24
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes,
Mike Perks <=
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/03/24
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/03/24
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes, Klaus Leidinger, 2008/03/24
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #22699] Errors in AVR910 Device Codes, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/03/24