RE: [Axiom-developer] On [bug #4587] )lisp *yearweek* is broken: intended behavior or bug?

[Weiss, Juergen]

With all the sources under cvs control we should consider
using cvs revision numbers for version management. Nevertheless
it is not clear, if using cvs revisions is sufficient.

Juergen Weiss

Juergen Weiss     | Universitaet Mainz, Zentrum fuer Datenverarbeitung,
address@hidden| 55099 Mainz, Tel: +49(6131)39-26361, FAX:
+49(6131)39-26407


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David MENTRE [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 9:16 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [Axiom-developer] On [bug #4587] )lisp *yearweek* is 
> broken: intended behavior or bug?
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> The ")lisp *yearweek*" command produces the following output:
> 
> Value = "Tuesday September 2, 2003 at 19:15:55 "
> 
> Is quite different from the expected output in the bug report:
> 
>  YYYYMMDDxxx where YYYY is the year, MM is the month, DD is 
> the day and
>  xxx is a unique number identifying a build.
> 
> So I consider this bug still Open, right?
> 
> Yours,
> d.
> -- 
>  address@hidden
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Axiom-developer mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
>