[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types...
From: |
Bill Page |
Subject: |
RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types... |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:54:45 -0400 |
>
> On September 18, 2006 1:50 PM C Y wrote:
> >
> > Sorry in advance if this question is a bit daft...
> >
>
On September 18, 2006 2:16 PM I wrote:
> Not at all. There is not such thing as a daft question -
> however always keep in mind that the same is not true of
> answers. :-)
>
I am afraid that what I wrote below might be a good example of
a "daft answer" - even if it is in the right spirit... :(
This idea needs more work. On 2nd thought what I wrote below
does not make good sense as it stands. Maybe this is better:
(2) -> a1:MPOLY([a1,a2],INT)
Type: Void
(3) -> a2:MPOLY([a1,a2],INT)
Type: Void
(4) -> a1+a2
(4) a1 + a2
Type: MultivariatePolynomial([a1,a2],Integer)
This way it is clear that there are no indeterminants that are
not integers.
Regards,
Bill Page.
> > --- Earlier I wrote:
> ...
> My proposal is that to define this in algebraic terms what we
> need is a domain like Polynomial which consists of some symbols
> and expressions (of a specific kind) over these symobls. So it
> is clear, right? that the type
>
> Polynomial Integer
>
> consists of a large clase of expressiions of that type. And saying
>
> a1:Polynomial Integer
>
> is just a way of saying that the variable a1 will take values from
> this domain.
>
> But because the coefficients of the polynomial must come from the
> domain Integer we know that these Integers are embedded in this class
> of expressions as polynomials of degree 0, so we have no problem
> specifying that a certain variable suchs as 'a1' is exact such an
> integer (polynomial of degree 0).
>
> In general both Integer and Polynomial Integer has Ring so, yes
> it is true that Polynomial Integer can be used in (most) places
> where would like to use Integer (but were no specific value is
> required).
>
> The only concern I have is whether or not Polynomial Integer is
> "big enough" to model everything that we would want to mean by
> "indefinite integer".
>
> Regards,
> Bill Page.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Axiom-developer mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
>
>
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., (continued)
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Bill Page, 2006/09/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/09/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/09/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/09/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/09/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Bertfried Fauser, 2006/09/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/09/18
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Bill Page, 2006/09/18
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., C Y, 2006/09/18
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Bill Page, 2006/09/18
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types...,
Bill Page <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/09/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., C Y, 2006/09/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/09/18
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Bill Page, 2006/09/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/09/19
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Bill Page, 2006/09/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/09/19
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Question concerning types..., C Y, 2006/09/17