axiom-developer
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Axiom-commit] SF.net SVN: axiom: [266]branche


From: Gabriel Dos Reis
Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Axiom-commit] SF.net SVN: axiom: [266]branches/build-improvements/src
Date: 18 Nov 2006 03:57:58 +0100

"Bill Page" <address@hidden> writes:

| On November 17, 2006 8:26 PM Gabriel Dos Reis
| > 
| > address@hidden writes:
| > 
| > | Revision: 266
| > |           http://svn.sourceforge.net/axiom/?rev=266&view=rev
| > | Author:   whebisch
| > | Date:     2006-11-15 12:29:45 -0800 (Wed, 15 Nov 2006)
| > | 
| > | Log Message:
| > | -----------
| > | Make preloading of databases effective
| > | 
| > ... 
| >   This patch seems to have broken build-improvements: Many of the
| > components are no longer built, in particular the regression test
| > is not longer run.
| 
| That's odd. I built Axiom on Nov 15 19:04 from the build-improvements
| repository (Revision: 274) on the axiom-developer.org server with no
| problems - at least none that I noticed. The build log shows that
| the regression tests were all run and Axiom seems to work fine in
| simple manual confidence tests.
| 
| What components in particular were not built?


graph, sman, hyper and input.

| What error message should I look for in the log?

There is no dirct error message on console.  However, when I looked at
build/$target/trace, there are many instances of hyperdoc complaining
it does not understand \spad.

I'm running a binary search on another machine, and I'll revert only
when it is cross-checked.

| What machine were you using for the test?

I did the binary search on my laptop, i686-pc-linux-gnu.
I'm cross checking on a x86-suse-linux.

| The only thing I did a little differently from the standard build
| was that I pre-built gcl from the zips because on axiom-developer
| I need to set maxpages < 256*1024. This time I built it with
| 200*1024.

That should not matter.

| > I spent the whole day tracking down the breakage. I'll revert this
| > patch, so that you can fletch it out in greater details, and the
| > branch remains still operational.  
| > 
| 
| What do you think is going wrong?

I don't know yet -- if I knew I would just fix it :-)

-- Gaby




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]