[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries
From: |
Franz Lehner |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:37:52 +0200 (CEST) |
It depends what you really want.
I really want
1. no damaged memory
2. aldor compiler; the error messages of the spad compiler are not
satisfactory for me.
3. recent bugfixes
What options do I have? So far I tried wh-sandbox and the wrong silver
branch.
--enable-checking sets Lisp safety
to 3, but only in build-improvements branch. In wh-sandbox --enable-checking
is ignored, like other unrecognized --enable-xxx options.
If you want to build with Lisp safety set to 3 than wh-sandbox
should build OK.
yes it did. Aldor did not due to the changed directory structure.
AFAIK gold/silver will not build with
safety set to 3 -- one has to fix a few problems and the fixes
are not applied yet. I am not sure about build-improvements.
I guess the missing |output| function is one of these problems.
OTOH safety 3 means very significant slowdown. On the same machine
safety 0 build took about 2.5 hours while safety 3 build needed
about 19 hours.
It was roughly 12 hours here.
Is runtime speed affected by this?
Franz
- Re: [Axiom-developer] merge branches/daly to trunk (was: NAG libraries), (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Alfredo Portes, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Waldek Hebisch, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries,
Franz Lehner <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Safe version, Waldek Hebisch, 2007/06/07
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Safe version, Franz Lehner, 2007/06/08