[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad
From: |
Stephen Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad |
Date: |
11 Jul 2007 12:40:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
Gabriel Dos Reis <address@hidden> writes:
> Stephen Wilson <address@hidden> writes:
> | I think the consensus is that `hybrid' Union types are not desirable.
>
> I'm not sure I understand the arguments why they are not desirable.
Main question is _why_ they might be desirable. Spad does not
support them. Aldor might in theory, but only in theory.
As such a construct appears to give no real benefit for anyone, Im
thinking that properly encoding the constraint is the proper move.
Do you have an argument for `hybrid' Unions?
Thanks,
Steve
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Waldek Hebisch, 2007/07/09
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Bill Page, 2007/07/09
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/07/09
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Bill Page, 2007/07/09
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Bill Page, 2007/07/09
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/07/09
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Bill Page, 2007/07/09
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/07/09
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/07/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad,
Stephen Wilson <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/07/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/07/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/11
Re: [Axiom-developer] Unions in Spad, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/07/11