bayonne-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bayonne-devel] The next production release update, 1.2.12, long ove


From: Anton Dedov
Subject: Re: [Bayonne-devel] The next production release update, 1.2.12, long overdue
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:56:03 +0700

Hello David.

I have sent several patches to bayonne-devel forum and at bayonne's site
on savannah.gnu.org but it seems that they were not appeared in
bayonne-1.2.12.

ccScript still does not compile with gcc-3.3 without my patch.
Also I have sent a fix for russian translation module for bayonne which 
were not included in 1.2.12 too.

Best regards,
Anton Dedov


On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:11:27 -0400
David Sugar <address@hidden> wrote:

> I have prepared a new 1.2.12 release of Bayonne which should be out 
> soon.  This release includes the experimental new multi-party audio 
> conference patch for use with Dialogic hardware.  With it I have also 
> experimented with generating a single cross-reference framework
> document 
> with doxygen that covers bayonne as well as the common c++ classes,
> all 
> in one organized and cross-linked class framework reference document. 
> As a pdf, it came out at around 800 pages.  I am also looking at some 
> new options for providing pre-built packages for 1.2.x.
> 
> Between illness, a lack of time, a cross-state move, and a number of 
> other things, it's been awhile since I have been able to properly 
> address some issues that were left in the 1.2.x releases.  Now that I 
> have facilities needed to maintain the production release at our new 
> location, I do intend to better maintain the 1.2.x series better and
> to 
> resolve open issues, even after we have a new production series in 
> active release.  This leads to a question; should we continue using 
> Common C++ 1.0.13 for the base support lib for future Bayonne 1.2.x 
> production updates, or should we update Bayonne 1.2.x to use the
> current 
> 1.2.5 release of Common C++ (and perhaps upgrade to the new ccaudio as
> 
> well)?
> 
> Since this is a question that effects people who have had 1.2.x 
> production environments that in a number of cases have been running
> for 
> one or more years, I would rather hear some feedback from those who
> have 
> been running production environments rather than just making an 
> arbitrary choice for them.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bayonne-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel

Attachment: bayonne-russian.cpp.diff
Description: Text document

Attachment: ccscript-script.cpp.diff
Description: Text document

Scanned by evaluation version of Dr.Web antivirus Daemon 
http://drweb.ru/unix/


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]