[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fw: Kill warnings

From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: Fw: Kill warnings
Date: 30 Nov 2001 16:33:12 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service)

>>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Bart <address@hidden> writes:

Pascal> Well, there are no warnings in Bison source code =).

So just tell me how come exp no longer compiles.  And have a look at
all the reports from Hans about 1.30x.

>> Maybe your memory is too short: you were in the set of people
>> complaining about signed < unsigned :) :) :)

Pascal> LOL, yes but it was differents, it was the generated parser,
Pascal> which did any warnings, here we're talking about Bison's
Pascal> sources. 

Nope, read again.  I also mention the test suite.

Pascal> I'm not really sure to understand you, are you talking about
Pascal> Bison's sources, or about Bison's generated parser ?  


Pascal> This is really different, we're allowed to leave warnings in
Pascal> Bison's sources but not in the generated parser.

Agreed.  But given there were only a couple of them in the sources,
let's go up to 100% warning-less-ness.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]