[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;'
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;' |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:56:06 +0100 |
At 14:17 -0800 2002/03/03, Paul Eggert wrote:
>> I would like to
>>
>> - know whether POSIX says something,
>
>POSIX requires the ending ';'. And for good reason: it allows the
>Yacc grammar to be Yaccable.
Paul, do you know if POSIX says that LALR(1) must be used? -- The current
implementation of %expect seems to depend on the type of algorithm used.
>While we're on the subject of semicolon trivia, ...
I believe you have the right wording here. :-)
I can note a technique of using several grammars, that I used when working
a bit on developing a Prolog interpreter: Then I wanted to develop a more
set-theoretic syntax, but it proved cumbersome to paste in Prolog examples
from various places. So it proved convenient to have a prolog { ... }
environment where the traditional Prolog syntax could be used.
A variation adapted for Bison might look like
yacc { ... } -- For Yacc syntax.
bison { ... } -- For Bison syntax.
Then, with a special %syntax ..., one might choose the default syntax.
Hans Aberg
- RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Hans Aberg, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Paul Eggert, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;',
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/04
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Hans Aberg, 2002/03/04
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/04
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Hans Aberg, 2002/03/04