[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glr.c: Token definitions
|
From: |
Paul Hilfinger |
|
Subject: |
Re: glr.c: Token definitions |
|
Date: |
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:48:24 -0700 |
> Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I propose that newer skeletons define the tokens only using enums, not
> > #defines in addition.
The only possible objection I can see would be from someone who
#ifdefed on a token, but I suppose that is an obscure and dicey enough
possibility to ignore.
Paul H.
- glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions,
Paul Hilfinger <=
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/20
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/21
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/21
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/21
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/21
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/23
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/23
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/21
Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/20