[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: %destructor feedback

From: Joel E. Denny
Subject: Re: %destructor feedback
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:02:30 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:

> >>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>  > These two patches are still pending in this area.
>  >
>  >
>  > The former is more important.  I'd like Paul H.'s opinion on it, but
>  > if he's busy I guess we can check it in and then revert it if problems
>  > turn up.  I will try to look at the latter in the next couple of days.
> I installed both.

Thanks.  In one of these threads, I mentioned that the second patch breaks 
maintainer-check because I forgot to cast the return of malloc().  I'll 
submit another patch to fix this later.

>  They were still badly formatted by the way :)

I'm clueless.

I just tried exporting the second patch from the email I received back 
through the mailing list.  I found that applying it perfectly reproduced 
my original code.  However, I see that the CVS copy has a number of tabs 
from my original code converted to spaces.  I'm guessing all of this also 
holds true for the first patch, but I haven't tried it.

Could it be something wrong on your end? Did anyone else have a problem 
this time?  If it's still me, does anyone have any clue what I could be 
doing wrong?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]