[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dubious features
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Dubious features |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:43:15 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
> * src/scan-gram.l: No longer "parse" things after `%union' until
> `{'. Rather, implement the simpler behavior of Solaris Yacc:
> match a single token from '%union[^{]*'.
I don't like this, because it breaks a grammar that has a comment
containing "{" between the %union and the following brace. E.g.:
%union /* There is a special case for "{" in this union. */
{
/* Strings that do not contain "{". */
char const *brace_free_strings;
/* Strings that contain "{". */
char *braced_strings;
}
Solaris yacc is clearly broken in this regard, but we shouldn't
emulate the bug.
- Re: Dubious features, (continued)
- Re: Dubious features, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dubious features, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dubious features, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dubious features, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/07
Re: Dubious features, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/10
- Re: Dubious features, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/11
- Re: %union ... {, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/16
- Re: %union ... {, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/16
- Re: %union ... {, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/17
- Re: %union ... {, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/19
- Re: %union ... {, Hans Aberg, 2006/06/19
- Re: %union ... {, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/19