[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glr: include the created header
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: glr: include the created header |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:12:39 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
> They're definitions mostly as opposed to just declarations. I imagine
> that's why it's called %defines and --defines. So, I decided %pre-defines
> and %post-defines makes more sense.
This all sounds OK (in that I can't simplify it much more :-) except
that the names are still confusing. "%pre-defines" sounds like
predefined symbols, but then "%post-defines" would be -- what --
postdefined symbols?
How about if we call them both "%defines" and decide which is which
depending on context? That would match %{...%}'s behavior.
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/11
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/14
- Re: glr: include the created header, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/15
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/15
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/16
- Re: glr: include the created header,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: glr: include the created header, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/16
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/16
- Re: glr: include the created header, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/17
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/17
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/16
- Re: glr: include the created header, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/17
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/17
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/19
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/19
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/19