[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: push parser implemenation
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: push parser implemenation |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:24:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>> What's the minimum percentage of lost time that could be afforded in
>> order for me to merge the push skeleton into the yacc skeleton?
> I'd like it to be low -- in the 1% or less range, anyway.
I think that if we really want to speed yacc.c, we can. For instance
yyparse is so big that it certainly prevents any smart register
allocation. We can try to improve the yacc.c bits of push.c to speed
it up. That way we remain conform with the old figures. But of
course, this is still a "theoretical loss" of performances.
Would that suffice to you?
- Re: push parser implemenation, (continued)
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/12
- Re: push parser implemenation, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/12
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/12
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: push parser implemenation, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/14
Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/07
Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/07
Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14
Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14