|
From: | Hans Aberg |
Subject: | Re: experimental features in Bison 2.3a+ |
Date: | Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:15:22 +0100 |
On 2 Dec 2006, at 06:23, Paul Eggert wrote:
"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:It seems to me that the following features ought to be documented asexperimental since they have been somewhat controversial even among Bisondevelopers:1. Default %destructor's and %printer's. These are currently declaredwith <*> and <>.2. The prologue alternatives: %code, %requires, %provides, and % code-top.Yes. Though to be honest I can't even remember what all of them are for....
I am too curious about that; especially %code: I suggested a %define for code placement to be called %code. And %requires, %provides sounds as though taken from LaTeX 2. But what is %code-top?
And isn't the technical word commonly used for experimental "unsupported", meaning that there is no official support for its stability.
Hans Aberg
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |