Re: m4sugar update

[Joel E. Denny]

Hi Eric,

On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Eric Blake wrote:

> Now that my copyright papers are complete, I rebased my m4sugar patches to
> the current HEAD and verified that they allow operation with what will
> become m4 1.6, whereas without the patch it failed.  Is it okay to commit
> these three patches?

Yes, thanks.

> Eric Blake (3):
> ~      Fix comments in m4sugar.
> ~      Partial m4sugar merge from autoconf: builtins, version.m4.
> ~      Partial m4sugar merge from autoconf: m4_wrap vs. m4 1.6.

Now that m4_wrap is FIFO, I believe the m4_wrap invocation in bison.m4 
should be converted to m4_wrap_lifo.  Otherwise, the m4_wrap text at the 
end of m4sugar.m4 isn't expanded last as intended.