[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: named references
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Re: named references |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:23:08 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Thanks a lot for all this work. I know several people who are eager
> to use Bison with your contribution!
I know I'm eager.
> I'm not sure asymmetric will be understandable in error messages.
> Maybe "partial" would be more appropriate?
I agree "asymmetric" is a confusing name. "partial" may be better. A few
other ideas off the top of my head: "incomplete", "nonuniform",
"inconsistent".
> > You may consider it "disabled" in the following examples. Actually,
> > I am not sure that it would be helpful.
>
> I subscribe to Joel's ideas about this, I would really prefer that we
> have this warning. Actually, we didn't we make this an error?
I can't remember, but an error seems good to me.
- named references, Alex Rozenman, 2009/03/06
- Re: named references, Joel E. Denny, 2009/03/08
- Re: [PATCH] Re: named references,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: [PATCH] Re: named references, Akim Demaille, 2009/03/20
- Re: [PATCH] Re: named references, Joel E. Denny, 2009/03/20
- Re: [PATCH] Re: named references, Joel E. Denny, 2009/03/20
- Re: [PATCH] Re: named references, Alex Rozenman, 2009/03/22
- Re: [PATCH] Re: named references, Joel E. Denny, 2009/03/20
- Re: [PATCH] Re: named references, Akim Demaille, 2009/03/20
- Re: [PATCH] Re: named references, Joel E. Denny, 2009/03/20
- Re: [PATCH] Re: named references, Alex Rozenman, 2009/03/22