bison-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: C99 in Bison


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: C99 in Bison
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:19:34 +0200


Le 31 août 09 à 17:42, Joel E. Denny a écrit :

Hi Akim.

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Akim Demaille wrote:

Alternatively, we could poll at help-bison and might get an answer faster.

Yes, but what's the size of the poll?

I just checked the subscriber list and it's 260.

Wow, much larger than I expected. I should pay more attention to what I'm writing :)

So there are several polls:

- c90 for generated yacc parsers (btw, the open group specs for yacc say "write C source code, conforming to the ISO C standard", which is unclear bw c90 and c99, but excludes any requirement to support knr).

- remove the availability to reach the parse-params from the %printer and %destructor, at least in lalr1.cc.

- ?

While that's smaller
than the number of people who receive NEWS, it would be a decent initial
poll.

By the way, I'm not able to look at the subscriber lists for bug- bison and
bison-patches.  Why is that?

No idea. The manager of the list may decide who can see the subscribers (anybody|subscribers|manager) but I don't know what rule the fsf follows.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]