|
From: | Juergen Sauermann |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-apl] Version control |
Date: | Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:46:02 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130330 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
Hi,
my concern is not the ultimate responsibility because if we get more and more sub-projects then I would NOT like to be responsible for the merges. I would prefer if the responsibilities are agreed beforehand and then every contributor would have, say, her subdirectory and with it also the responsibility in terms of maintenance and documentation for that subdirectory. As a GNU maintainer I would also think that the sources should be hosted by the GNU project in the first place, and that the GNU policies should be followed. I would also like to mention that so far GNU savannah worked very well for me and that the guys behind it are very responsive when it comes to problems. And many current GNU APL users follow the main GNU APL SVN - why should we change that? That does not prevent a local repository for development. I have my own local SVN (the 6000+ numbers on the GNU APL welcome screen are my local SVN numbers). A commit to the remote GNU APL SVN repository is only made after a local build, debian packaging, and RPM packaging has succeeded (see make EXPO on top-level), I believe we should do something similar for the sub-projects. /// Jürgen On 04/13/2014 04:56 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |