Re: [Bug-apl] Not a syntax error

[enztec]

Hi

I think it is really is a syntax error

Creating gg as a 'procedure' (returns no value) vs using it as a function 
(returns a value) in coding

But argument can be made that gg  has no value

On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 12:54:32 +0200
Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hello Blake,
> 
> yes, thanks. Fixed in SVN 202.
> 
> /// Jürgen
> 
> 
> On 04/12/2014 08:00 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
> >       ∇gg                      gg created as a 'procedure'
> > [1] 4
> > [2] ∇
> >       gg
> > 4
> >       x←gg                     use of gg as a 'function'
> > 4
> > SYNTAX ERROR
> >       x←gg
> >       ^ ^
> >
> > I understand what is wrong with gg.  The problem is the error message. 
> >  I think it is wrong.  Shouldn't it be VALUE ERROR  ?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Blake
> >
> 
>