Re: [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation

[Elias Mårtenson]

Probably in the APL code with some support code in the library. The reason for this is that a native library can only have a single entry point, and that entry point has to be either an operator or a normal function. It's a normal function now, and I have no intention of changing that.

Regards,

Elias

On 21 April 2014 13:37, David B. Lamkins <address@hidden> wrote:

On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 12:21 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> I think that I should probably implement SQL∆with_transaction. It
> belongs in the SQL layer. It's also the only way to ensure that
> transaction rollback on error is handled correctly.

I agree that that's probably the right place to do it. Would it be in
the library (C) or in the wrapper (APL)?

I kind of like the operator approach (as in the component file code),
but my implementation might not be sufficiently general for other
applications.