Re: [Bug-apl] quad-FX

[David B. Lamkins]

Looks good. Thank you.

On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 20:10 +0200, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> I have changed the handling of function pending on the SI. You can now
> ⎕FX functions if the pending function name is localized. This is, I believe,
> what the standard tries to say ("locally-erasable") but does not go as 
> far as IBM.
> 
> I guess in practice this will be confusing anyhow. SVN 272.
> 
> /// Jürgen
> 
> 
> 
> On 05/16/2014 08:35 PM, David B. Lamkins wrote:
> > According to the IBM reference, quad-FX should change the definition of
> > a function in the workspace even when the function is pendent.
> >
> >
>