[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong
From: |
Jay Foad |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Aug 2014 14:58:52 +0100 |
Right. Even in GNU APL monadic lambdas consume and ignore any left
argument you give them, so you could argue that it's consistent for
niladic lambdas to consume and ignore both arguments.
Jay.
On 7 August 2014 14:53, Elias Mårtenson <address@hidden> wrote:
> And, one could argue that knowing that lambdas are always variadic is quite
> consistent in itself.
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Jay Foad, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Jay Foad, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Jay Foad, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong,
Jay Foad <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/08
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/08