Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?

[Jay Foad]

On 25 November 2014 at 14:06, Jay Foad <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 25 November 2014 at 13:38, Juergen Sauermann
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I have read the IBM binding rules a number of times but they seem not to
>> help. The problem of these rules is
>> that they give different results in the cases where / is an operator and
>> where / is a function.
>
> In IBM APL2 / is always an operator.

For example:

      1 2/¨3 4 ⍝ GNU APL, NARS2000 and Dyalog: parse as 1 2(/¨)3 4
 3  4 4

     1 2/¨3 4 ⍝ APL2: parse as (1 2/)¨3 4
 3 3 3  4 4 4

Jay.