[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] Calling external editor from APL session
From: |
Alexey Veretennikov |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] Calling external editor from APL session |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:16:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (darwin) |
Actually it is a great thread, I also agree with Christian what the
full-text editor support should be a part of interpreter (as it is in
IBM APL2 and Dyalog).
Kacper Gutowski <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:30:14AM +0100, Alexey Veretennikov wrote:
>> Using )HOST Vim complains "Vim: Warning: Output is not to a terminal"
>> and not really useful (can't see what I type for instance).
>> Same if I use popen() via ⎕FIO.
>
> )HOST and popen are essentially the same thing and they both capture
> output of the command you are running. But as they take command to
> be interpreted by shell, you can explicitly redirect output to the
> terminal yourself:
>
> )HOST vim >/dev/tty
>
> In case of vim, which reinitializes terminal settings itself and isn't
> bothered by having echo disabled, this is everything you need to make
> it work.
>
> See also <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-apl/2016-03/msg00138.html>
> for working proof-of-concept implementation of what Jürgen wrote.
>
> -k
--
Br,
/Alexey
Re: [Bug-apl] Calling external editor from APL session, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/12/20
- Re: [Bug-apl] Calling external editor from APL session,
Alexey Veretennikov <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] Calling external editor from APL session, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/12/20
- Re: [Bug-apl] Calling external editor from APL session, Alexey Veretennikov, 2016/12/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Calling external editor from APL session, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/12/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Calling external editor from APL session, David B. Lamkins, 2016/12/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Calling external editor from APL session, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/12/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Calling external editor from APL session, David B. Lamkins, 2016/12/21