Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2008-12-29; doctex mode

[Ralf Angeli]

Please keep the mailing list copied!

* Jobst Hoffmann (2009-03-02) writes:

> Am Montag, den 02.03.2009, 18:43 +0100 schrieb Ralf Angeli:
>> * Jobst Hoffmann (2009-03-01) writes:
>> 
>> > The filling of doctex modes seems to be erroneous, if I append the words
>> > "wrong filling" at the end of the line beginning with "% This..." in the
>> > appended file doctex_tst.dtx, the result is
>> >
>> > % This is a long, senseless sentence; the only reason of it's existence
>> > is
>> >  % to show the wrong filling
>> >
>> > This is not what I expect.
>> 
>> The file contains an erroneous "." at the end of the "mode: docTeX" line
>> which makes at least my Emacs complain.  Not sure if this is related,
>> though.  Because in any case, i.e. with or without the erroneous period,
>> it is working fine with Emacs and XEmacs 21.4.  So it could be an issue
>> specific to XEmacs 21.5.  I'll have to install that to check ...
> Sorry for the ".", but that's not the case of the error. It is indeed
> specific to XEmacs 21.5, my 21.4 works fine, I should have tested it
> before.

The problem is not specific to AUCTeX modes.  Just fire up XEmacs 21.5
and type `M-j' at the end of a commented line in the *scratch* buffer.
So this is an XEmacs issue, not one of AUCTeX.

>> > An additional question: I've created an auctex style file for the
>> > support of the LaTeX-package fancyvrb following the listings.el, but the
>> > result is not satisfying. While the indentation of the
>> > Verbatim-environment is correct, the indentation of the VerbatimOut has
>> > two errors:
>> 
>>   (setq LaTeX-verbatim-regexp
>>         (concat LaTeX-verbatim-regexp "\\|VerbatimOut \\|Verbatim"))
>>                                                      ^
>> Remove the blank at the marker.
> Thank you very much! I attach a corrected version, if you want you can
> publish it with the auctex distribution.

Do you have a copyright assignment on file at the FSF?

There are probably not so many lines in the file written originally by
you, but it would be a whole new file and I would not want to check it
in without an assignment.

By the way, you can remove the code concerned with font locking from it,
because it tries highlight macros, not environments.

-- 
Ralf