[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:43:00 +0200 |
* Andreas Breitbach (2009-06-26) writes:
> Oops, I missed that one when tiding up .emacs. Now it's there:
> (add-to-list 'load-path "/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex")(and
> also showing up at the first position in "C-h v load-path <RET>" and the
> "M-x locate-library <RET> reftex-base <RET>" also gives "Library is
> file /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex.el"
Asking for `reftex-base' gives a reference to `reftex'? Are you sure?
> ), but I get "RefTeX version 4.31" on "C-h v reftex-version <RET>".
That would mean the reftex.el file from the version coming with Emacs is
preferred to the one from the CVS version. This is a bit strange
because the load path shadows you sent below suggest the opposite.
If you do `M-x find-library <RET> reftex <RET>' and search for
"reftex-version" in the file, which version do you find? Perhaps you
could do the same after starting Emacs with
emacs -Q -l auctex --eval "(progn (add-to-list 'load-path
\"/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex\") (require 'reftex) (add-hook
'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-reftex))" file.tex
> And I also have the same output on "M-x list-load-path-shadows <RET>" as
> I sent along somewhat before:
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-index
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-index
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-sel
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-sel
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-toc
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-toc
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-dcr
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-dcr
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-global
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-global
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-cite
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-cite
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-auc
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-auc
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-ref
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-ref
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-parse
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-parse
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-vars
> hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars
This looks good.
> Before producing the aforementioned outputs, I reinstalled RefTeX and
> Emacs as mentioned before.
> C-c [ doesn't work, of course, but giving me a Backtrace with M-x
> toggle-debug-on-error(it seems to be the same output as I sent on
> Tuesday, I attached the new one, being called Backtrace2).
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable reftex-ref-style-alist)
This also looks like a mix-up of versions. The code in reftex-base.el
references that variable but it is not found in reftex-vars.el (assuming
that reftex-vars.el(c) is loaded) which would suggest that the old
reftex-vars.el(c) is loaded. I'm not sure how this can happen,
especially if /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex is at the front of
`load-path'. Did you insert the form for altering `load-path' before or
after `(require 'reftex)' into your init file?
--
Ralf
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/21
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/25
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/25
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex,
Ralf Angeli <=
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/27
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/27
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/27
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/27