Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.87; LaTeX-newline doesn't insert newline when comment-auto-fill-only-comments is set

[Mosè Giordano]

Hi Ralf,

2014-10-19 16:19 GMT+02:00 Ralf Angeli <address@hidden>:
> * Mosč Giordano (2014-10-18) writes:
>
>> 2014-10-18 10:53 GMT+02:00 Piet van Oostrum <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> The problem can be solved  by changing the last cond part in LaTeX-newline 
>>> from
>>>
>>>             (t
>>>              (indent-new-comment-line)))
>>> to
>>>             (t
>>>              (newline)))
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the report!  I can reproduce the bug and your change does
>> indeed fix it, but I'm wondering whether applying it would cause side
>> effects in other places, e.g. dtx files.  Ralf, you wrote this
>> function, what do you think?
>
> The change would indeed defeat the purpose of `LaTeX-newline'.  If
> `LaTeX-insert-into-comments' is t, the function makes sure that
> inserting a line break in a comment will insert a comment starter in the
> new line.  You can test this with the following line in a LaTeX
> document:
>
> % foo-!-
>
> The -!- marks the cursor position.  If you call `LaTeX-newline' here,
> you will get the following result:
>
> % foo
> % -!-
>
> With the proposed change you'd get this:
>
> % foo
> -!-

Thank you.  I've just noticed also insertion of other environments,
like itemize, gives weird results when
`comment-auto-fill-only-comments' is non-nil.  Does it make sense to
let-bind this variable to nil when calling `indent-new-comment-line'
in the line referenced by Piet?

Bye,
Mosè