Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c)

bug-autoconf

From:	Akim Demaille
Subject:	Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c)
Date:	26 Feb 2001 22:26:52 +0100
User-agent:	Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)

Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:

> Thanks for asking :-)
> You're very welcome to fix it.

OK, let's go!

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c), Paul Eggert, 2001/02/05
- Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c), Akim Demaille, 2001/02/25
  - Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c), Paul Eggert, 2001/02/26
    - Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c), Jim Meyering, 2001/02/26
    - Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c), Akim Demaille <=
    - Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c), Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26

Prev by Date: Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c)
Next by Date: Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c)
Previous by thread: Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c)
Next by thread: Re: AH_VERBATIM isn't really verbatim with backslashes (autoconf 2.49c)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread