[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intel compiler and autoconf
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: Intel compiler and autoconf |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:59:10 -0500 (EST) |
Hi, David!
> (account required) discusses this. The Intel engineers feel
> that this is a problem with autoconf and not their compiler.
> They suggested I pass the issue on to you folks.
I cannot find that feeling being expressed in the discussion.
You are setting CPP to the same value as CC:
CPP=$CC
Autoconf essentially does this by default:
CPP="$CC -E"
Since the compiler doesn't know that it's called as a preprocessor, it
fails sanity check as a preprocessor. The key question is why you want to
override CPP.
In fact, this is explained in the reply from "10/15/2002 12:53:27 PM" and
I don't see anybody disagreeing or explaining why overriding CPP is
necessary.
If you just provided your current understanding of the problem (rather
than your understanding before you got a reply from Intel), I would be
able to answer your question. By posting this HTML file you look like a
person who got a reply already and failed to understand it.
> I've attached an HTML copy of this thread's web page.
I think it's better if you don't send HTML to this list (I have noticed
your e-mail because it ended up in my spam folder). There may be legal
issues with sending pages from private servers to public mailing lists.
I suggest that all the mail containing HTML attachments is held for
moderator approval. I'm sorry to tell you, but there is a strong
correllation between HTML attachments and e-mails that contribute exactly
nothing to the community.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin