Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:23:03PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues <at> gmx.de> writes:
> > 
> > Thinking about it, it's clear that [ ] should have been written as
> > @|:@  @:|@
> 
> How so?  C99 supports <: and :> as the digraphs for [ and ].

I wasn't being very serious.

> Any other votes for the preferred spelling?

I'm fine with what you suggest.  Nits below.

> @@ -10904,6 +10912,14 @@ m4_quote(active2, active2)
>  @result{}ACT, IVE,ACT, IVE
>  m4_expand([active2, active2])
>  @result{}ACT, IVE, ACT, IVE
> +m4_expand([case $foo in #(
> +  [[!@@<:@@]]bar) blah ;;

How come this line doesn't end in #( ?

> +  *@@:@}@@ baz ;;
> +esac])
> address@hidden $foo in #(
> address@hidden  [![]) blah ;;

Likewise.

> address@hidden  *) baz ;;
> address@hidden
>  @end example
>  @end defmac

Cheers,
Ralf