bug-automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Failure in test silent5.test with heirloom make


From: Stefano Lattarini
Subject: Re: Failure in test silent5.test with heirloom make
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 18:40:41 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.3.4; i686; ; )

At Sunday 25 April 2010, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> 
wrote:
> Then, look at automake.in:lang_yacc_target_hook.  It already
> computes the name of the .c file.  The missing part is then to
> find out whether the .$(OBJEXT) or .lo file is renamed (and thus
> will already be handled by an explicit rule anyway), or whether it
> will be handled by one of the suffix rules .c.$(OBJEXT) or .c.lo. 
>
OK, I must admit to be stuck here.  How can I know what objects files 
are expected to be compiled from, say, a bar.c file, in turn generated
from a bar.l file?

Or (e.g.) how can I distinguish the following situation:

  foo_SOURCES = bar.l

(where bar.c is generated from bar.l, bar.o is generated from bar.c,
and no explicit dependency rule is generated), from the following
situation:

  foo_SOURCES = bar.l
  foo_CFLAGS =  $(AM_CFLAGS)

(where bar.c is generated from bar.l, and foo-bar.o is generated from 
bar.c, with an explicit dependency rule of foo-bar.o from bar.c)?

Thanks,
     Stefano




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]