[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash Path Duplications: An idea from zsh
From: |
John P Verel |
Subject: |
Re: Bash Path Duplications: An idea from zsh |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:57:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
Steven,
I'm interested. Thanks, and send it along.
Regards,
John
On 01/07/02, 11:38:11PM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> =>> There has been considerable recent discussion on the redhat-list
> =>> regarding path setting in Red Hat Linux and therefore in bash, their
> =>> default shell. The discussion centers around the common event of
> =>> multiple instances of the same directory(s) within path entries, flowing
> =>> in part from multiple invocations of bash startup files. A common work
> =>> around is conditional appendages to PATH, based on echo | grep tests.
> Some
> =>> discussants find this inelegant and seek a better way to do this.
> =>
> =>This is so trivial to do with shell functions that it's not worth
> =>putting into the shell proper. Look at examples/functions/pathfuncs
> =>in the bash distribution for guidance.
> =>
> =>The `case' statement and the [[...]] conditional command are your friends.
> =>There should be no need to resort to `echo | grep' tests.
> Chet, I almost agree with you :-)
>
> I have a program called envv written in perl which is used to edit the
> values of environment variables which are colon seperated lists. Very
> handy.
>
> Write me if you're interested. :-)
>
> --
> -Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have -
> -happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ
> -Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all-
> -individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? steveo@syslang.net
>
--
John P. Verel
Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech!