[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files
From: |
george at mvista dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files |
Date: |
6 Jun 2005 15:59:17 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From george at mvista dot com 2005-06-06 15:59
-------
Subject: Re: "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-06 14:56
> -------
> I checked in my patch. I will have a followup patch later.
>
> nm and gdb may or may not share that piece of code. You need to file a gdb
> bug report.
The problem is knowing where the info gets lost. My initial study seemed to
indicate that it was ld that was doing it, thus this report.
>
> BTW, does entry.S have dwarf debug info? does gdb get wrong line number on
> functions or just variables?
Yes, I use -gdwarf-2. The wrong info shows up on "bt" into entry.S where gdb
(run in emacs) shows the source file. What is displayed, ususlly, is some
header file. This is line number/source related. The reported function is the
nearest preceeding label and seems to be right.
>
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=990
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/990] New: debug symbols error, qunyingpan at yahoo dot com, 2005/06/02
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on data symbols in relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/04
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/04
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/05
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/05
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, george at mvista dot com, 2005/06/06
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/06
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files,
george at mvista dot com <=
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, qunyingpan at yahoo dot com, 2005/06/06
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, george at mvista dot com, 2005/06/06
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/06