[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/4538] static initialization ignored in static archive (.a)
From: |
ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/4538] static initialization ignored in static archive (.a) |
Date: |
23 May 2007 04:23:34 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu 2007-05-23
05:23 -------
and your reason for this is statement is because...?
The C++ spec is pretty clear. binutils is not handling linking of C++ code
properly when it's in an archive.
I get the idea of the archive is to only pull in what is needed. Static
initialization is expected, and thus
needed, and not doing it is not handling the C++ spec. Period.
So either this is a bug, or you should tell me binutils is only intended for C
code... in which case I'll just
re-submit this as a "feature request" for C++ support.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4538
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/4538] New: static initialization ignored in static archive (.a), ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu, 2007/05/22
- [Bug ld/4538] static initialization ignored in static archive (.a), amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/05/22
- [Bug ld/4538] static initialization ignored in static archive (.a),
ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu <=
- [Bug ld/4538] static initialization ignored in static archive (.a), amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/05/23
- [Bug ld/4538] static initialization ignored in static archive (.a), ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu, 2007/05/23
- [Bug ld/4538] static initialization ignored in static archive (.a), drow at false dot org, 2007/05/23
- [Bug ld/4538] static initialization ignored in static archive (.a), ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu, 2007/05/23