[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug ld/6766] New: Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?

From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Subject: [Bug ld/6766] New: Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?
Date: 24 Jul 2008 17:32:17 -0000

address@hidden entry]$ cat foo.c
foo ()
address@hidden entry]$ make
cc    -c -o foo.o foo.c
ar rv libfoo.a foo.o
ar: creating libfoo.a
a - foo.o
ld --entry foo -o foo libfoo.a
ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol foo; not setting start address
ld -u foo --entry foo -o bar libfoo.a
nm bar | grep foo
00000000004000b0 T foo
nm foo | grep foo
make: *** [all] Error 1

Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?

           Summary: Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ld
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org


------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]