bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel mo


From: nickc at redhat dot com
Subject: [Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:25:42 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421

--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Alan,

   Have you seen this bug report:

> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421

>             Summary: Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on ppc64el

> Quite a few symbols in kernel modules on ppc64el are dropped after upgrading 
> to
> binutils 2.25.  This in turn completely breaks module loading on ppc64el
> systems, per this Debian bug report:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808246

It seems that the cause of this was the patch for PR 4317:

   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4317

Perhaps we need to allow some targets to require that undefined locals 
are preserved ?

Cheers
   Nick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]