bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/21669] New: strip from binutils-2.28 SIGSEGVs when strips


From: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Subject: [Bug binutils/21669] New: strip from binutils-2.28 SIGSEGVs when strips ia64 files
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 14:52:24 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21669

            Bug ID: 21669
           Summary: strip from binutils-2.28 SIGSEGVs when strips ia64
                    files
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.29 (HEAD)
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: binutils
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
  Target Milestone: ---

Noticed when built gcc-6.3.0 and gcc-5.4.0 with bintils-2.28
(original report https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622500 )

In the build process of gcc the following object file is generated
that can crash 'strip':
    http://dev.gentoo.org/~slyfox/bugs/622500-ia64-strip/dwarf2out.o

Reproducible both on native ia64 box and when running cross-binutils on x85_64.

-fsanitize=address detects out-of-bouds access as:

==17093==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
0x61a000000598 ...
READ of size 8 at 0x61a000000598 thread T0
    #0 0x7feeb6dd4333 in find_link binutils-gdb/bfd/elf.c:1295
    #1 0x7feeb6dd48a1 in copy_special_section_fields
binutils-gdb/bfd/elf.c:1379
    #2 0x7feeb6dd5391 in _bfd_elf_copy_private_bfd_data
binutils-gdb/bfd/elf.c:1501
    #3 0x5623789a0952 in copy_object binutils-gdb/binutils/objcopy.c:2974
    #4 0x5623789a25d4 in copy_file binutils-gdb/binutils/objcopy.c:3336
    #5 0x5623789a6856 in strip_main binutils-gdb/binutils/objcopy.c:4261
    #6 0x5623789ab0f9 in main binutils-gdb/binutils/objcopy.c:5368
    #7 0x7feeb650f3f9 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x39648203f9)
    #8 0x562378996259 in _start (binutils-gdb/binutils/.libs/strip-new+0x16259)

The failure is easy to workaround but i'm not sure if comething breaks hint
invariant:

diff --git a/bfd/elf.c b/bfd/elf.c
index 5f37e7f79c..abb1499893 100644
--- a/bfd/elf.c
+++ b/bfd/elf.c
@@ -1291,7 +1291,8 @@ find_link (const bfd * obfd, const Elf_Internal_Shdr *
iheader, const unsigned i
   BFD_ASSERT (iheader != NULL);

   /* See PR 20922 for a reproducer of the NULL test.  */
-  if (oheaders[hint] != NULL
+  if (hint < elf_numsections (obfd)
+      && oheaders[hint] != NULL
       && section_match (oheaders[hint], iheader))
     return hint;

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]