[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %destructor feedback
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: %destructor feedback |
|
Date: |
Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:40:31 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
> That's fine with me, but what if someone declares a parse param as
> const? Moreover, for C++, could an overloaded assignment with strange
> semantics have an unexpected effect?
Yes, probably. Sigh. I guess we need a better solution.
- Re: %destructor feedback, (continued)
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/03
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/03
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/05
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/05
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Tzvetan Mikov, 2005/12/08
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/08
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/08