Re: SHA1Digest and SHA256Digest

[David Sugar]

We probably could put sha in r1 as well as -HEAD...I don't see any
immediate harm that could come from it's inclusion there, and it would get
it some testing and early use.

On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Federico Montesino Pouzols wrote:

> 
>       Ok, the two classes have been incorporated to cvs. I just did
> a modification: replaced uint32_t and uint64_t with uint32 and uint64,
> which are the corresponding "standard"/"portable" types in common
> c++. You can have a look at config.h to see how these types are
> defined.
> 
>       I noticed that you generated the diffs against the commoncpp
> CVS module (/cvsroot/commoncpp/commoncpp). It currently contains the
> code for the old Common C++ "1". Note that the CVS module for current
> Common C++ "2" releases is commoncpp2.
> 
>       Also, I am not sure why you needed to tweak socket.h, we have
> not seen any problem with that lines before. What is your system
> configuration? Could you try to build the code in the current cvs or
> some recent release from ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/commoncpp?
> 
>       Bye!
> 
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:22:35PM -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
> > Federico Montesino Pouzols <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > >   Good. I think these classes fit perfectly with cc++.
> > 
> > Great!
> > 
> > >   Personally, I think that adding the two exception cases is ok.
> > 
> > Done.
> > 
> > Here is the diff from anonymous CVS. Following that will be the two
> > files:
> > 
> >    src/sha.cpp
> >    demo/shadigest.cpp
> > 
> > Note that I did make some adjustments to some of the files in order to
> > build, most notably socket.h.
> > 
> > Thank you, Elizabeth
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
>