Re: urlstring testing/enhancement

[Federico Montesino Pouzols]

        Hi, ...

On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 04:45:04PM -0800, Chad Yates wrote:
> I built urlstring testcases this weekend. Here are the test cases performed:
>   URLStringTest.testBinaryBase64EncodeDecode ...
>   URLStringTest.testStringVersion ...
>   URLStringTest.testTypicalUrlEncodeDecode ...
>   URLStringTest.testTypicalTextBase64EncodeDecode ...
>   URLStringTest.testSimpleTextBase64EncodeDecode ...
>   URLStringTest.testComplexTextBase64EncodeDecode ...
>   URLStringTest.testPaddingPerfect ...
>   URLStringTest.testPadding1Short ...
>   URLStringTest.testPadding2Short ...
> 
> I also added Base64 functions that take std::string arguments for the encode
> output and the decode input.  I don't know where the line is supposed to be
> relating to string usage as I see most of common c++ is char* based, but
> there seems to be std::string usage in some classes.  personally I like
> having it as an overload option.  I can post diffs showing the new functions
> if they are wanted.
> 

        I think we should include these new functions. For the last
months some things have been changed and updated to progresively
incorporate string as preferred to char*. These new functions do not
break backwards compatibility, so I see no reason to not include it.

> ,Chad
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp