|
From: | Chad Yates |
Subject: | Re: Rearranging source files |
Date: | Mon, 05 Jan 2004 11:44:37 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 |
David Sugar wrote:
On the side I began a project to split the source out by class as you are doing. I think it makes a lot of sense, and was doing so because it was difficult to keep track of what files contained what classes. I can't remember how far along I was in it, and it's in a archive of one of my local cvs installations that I haven't set back up yet. I think its a good idea for the long term anyway.How about the namespace Gnu::? after all this is an official gnu project, isnt it?Perhaps we should change the namespace at some point. Of course, there is no coordination among gnu C++ related package maintainers for the use of a gnu:: namespace at present, so my first concern is how easy it might be for each of us to stomp over the other, and we definately needed a separate namespace. ost:: did well for that purpose the same way sun. does for Java classlibs, especially from before it was a gnu package. If we were to choose any other namespace later, I think the right choice would likely be to use gnu::...Marc On Saturday 27 December 2003 17:06, you wrote:It could make it easier to find things, but some classes were so trivial. Generally, source files are split by hiearchies of related classes and by library (ccgnu, ccext), although in many cases a source file do cover a single class and other cases a grouping of closely related classes. "Marc Boris Dürner" said:Hi, Just wondering if the source files could be split so that there is one class per file? regards, Marc
,chad
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |