bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: df 4.5.3 returning misleading/incorrect info


From: Bob Proulx
Subject: Re: df 4.5.3 returning misleading/incorrect info
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:15:22 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

----- Forwarded message from Frank 'xraz' Fricke <address@hidden> -----

From: Frank 'xraz' Fricke <address@hidden>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 14:57:48 +0100
To: address@hidden (Bob Proulx)
Subject: Re: df 4.5.3 returning misleading/incorrect info

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:07:52 -0700
address@hidden (Bob Proulx) wrote:

|Frank 'xraz' Fricke <address@hidden> [2002-12-09 11:36:47 +0100]:
|
|> now if i unmount /dev/hde2:
|> 
|> |xr2k:~# umount /dev/hde2
|> |xr2k:~# df -m /dev/hde2
|> |Filesystem           1M-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
|> |/dev/hde2                 5946      2519      3125  45%
|> 
|> it displays the values of /dev/hda1 claiming it's /dev/hde2 !
|
|Yes and no.  It displays the values of / and makes no claim as to what
|it is.  That looks like a bug.  It should list / in the "Mounted on"
|field but that field is empty.

and it should list /dev/hda1 in the first field. saying
|Filesystem
|/dev/hde2
at least looks like a claim to me :)

|At the point in the time that there is no mount associated with
|/dev/hde2 then that file is absolutely no different than any other
|file which is under "/".  There is no way to tell the difference.

thats the point - why does it the show a diefference to a normal file
under / ?

shouldn't then

|xr2k:~# df -m /dev/hde2
|Filesystem           1M-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
|/dev/hde2                 5946      2519      3125  45%

not display the same as:

|xr2k:~# df -m /etc/passwd
|Filesystem           1M-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
|/dev/hda1                 5946      2519      3125  45% /

?
don't get me wrong: i can absolutely live with this behaviour. it
irritates only one time :)
but it looked more like an inaccuracy in the code wich maybe could
lead to other things...
i'm sorry i don't have the time to look at the sources myself atm.

regards...

   ...Frank

http://www.gnupg.org         |         http://xraz.de/gpg.key
Fingerpint: C1E1 0A5C 3733 F4F1 D59B 14F7 57C6 1784 8F78 8A2B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9+zjcV8YXhI94iisRAoiMAJ9bugU2rOtKqgviJyLbmnKn7drBwACfeqrD
BFf7YdLV1M6NY2aqFau2eno=
=WjgU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


----- End forwarded message -----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]