Re: 4.5.9 test failure: fail-2eperm

[Jim Meyering]

address@hidden (Paul Jarc) wrote:
>> Here's another possible fix for the tests/rm/fail-2eperms test for those of
>> us that dont have setuidgid on our systems
>
> I think the plan is that an equivalent tool will be built as part of
> coreutils (though not installed).  There won't be any new
> dependencies.

Right.