Re: Optimal buffer size for copy

[neillm]

Hello Paul,

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:03:46PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Suppose we just split out buffer_lcm into a separate module and use
> that?

Thanks again for the feedback.  I've taken a look at this and the
buffer_lcm method is concise and more robust than the proposed ones.
So I'm certainly in favor of doing this, but there is one remaining
issue I'd like some feedback on: would it be more appropriate to add
the single method to an existing lib file (and which) as opposed to
adding a new file?  As seen in my last mailing, adding new files
complicates the proposed patch quite a bit.


Best regards,
-Neill.