Re: multi field join

[Jim Meyering]

address@hidden wrote:
> So, not having heard any replies to this, I'm assuming there isn't much
> interest.  Since I already have a patch that incorporates this
> functionality, is there any chance of it getting included in the project?

It's hard to evaluate with so little information.
Send the patch with examples (the more the better)
showing how it can be useful.

-----------------
Here are some guidelines for contributing code to the coreutils
package (previously known as the fileutils, textutils, and sh-utils).

Send patches. (send unified diffs, please -- i.e. diff -u format) If your
changes fix bugs, the bar is quite low in that I don't need much more
than to understand what the original problem was.  However, it helps
a lot if you can give me enough information to reproduce the problem.

On the other hand, if you're adding new features, please follow the
guidelines below:

  - convince me that this is a useful change/addition
      (if you're adding yet another option to ls, the above is pretty hard)

  - convince other people of the same thing
      One way to do that is to send mail to address@hidden
      (aka the gnu.utils.bug news group) including as much description
      and justification as you can.  Based on the feedback that generates,
      you may be able to convince me.

Once we agree the change is useful and get around to considering the
actual addition to the code, it helps if you do the following:

  - base your changes on the latest test release -- currently here:
      ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/; better still, you can base
      your changes on the latest code in CVS, here:
      http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=coreutils

  - follow the guidelines in the GNU Coding Standards (standards.info)
      which is distributed as part of the autoconf package.

  - include changes to the texinfo documentation, and be sure to update
      the --help output.

  - finally, if the change is `significant' you'll have to send signed
      copyright assignment papers to the FSF

And you'll have to be patient and expect delays on my part.
It is unusual that I spend more than a few hours per week
on the packages I maintain.